JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 26, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Luis Enrique Cardenas Magallanes

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Inicio De Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia C-511 De 1999. La Funcion De Verificar Si Las Autoridades Publicas Han Obedecido Lo Dispuesto En Las Providencias Y Fallos Esta Confiada A Otras Autoridades, En El Campo De Sus Respectivas Competencias. No Esta Regulado En La Constitución Ni En La Ley El Incidente De Desacato Respecto De Providencias Proferidas Por Esta Corte En Desarrollo Del Control Abstracto De Inconstitucionalidad. El Desacato Ha Sido Contemplado Respecto De Las Providencias Que Profieren Los Jueces Y La Propia Corte En Materia De Accion De Tutela, En Los Terminos Del Articulo 52 Del Decreto 2591 De 1991. Rechazar Por Improcedente La Solictud
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Improcedencia respecto de providencias proferidas en desarrollo del control de inconstitucionalidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR, por improcedente, la solicitud de iniciar el trámite de un incidente de desacato, presentada por el ciudadano Luis Enrique Cárdenas Magallanes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.